SWIFT executive defends banks' role in the blockchain era
- Banks seek their own governance rather than external blockchains
- SWIFT sees public blockchains as an execution layer only.
- Cryptocurrencies spark debates on neutrality and institutional trust
SWIFT's Chief Innovation Officer, Tom Zschach, stated that traditional banks are unlikely to fully transfer transaction settlement to external blockchains or distributed systems. According to him, open source code and the transparency of public networks alone do not guarantee the trust required by financial institutions. For the executive, governance, compliance, and legal enforceability must be under the internal control of the entities themselves.
Zschach emphasized that while distributed ledgers offer programmability, financial institutions don't want to "live on a competitor's tracks." He classified public blockchains, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, as a "substrate," a useful technological foundation, but insufficient to meet the requirements of trusted settlement in the banking sector.
"Public blockchains are the baseline environment for execution. The transformation occurs when you add the layer of trust that makes the results legally enforceable, compliant, and safe to scale," the executive wrote in a LinkedIn post.
According to Zschach, the next stage of integration will not be crypto networks replacing the financial system, but rather the financial sector absorbing the best of public blockchains on its own terms.
The SWIFT executive also refuted the idea that tokens like XRP would be the ideal option for banks simply because they survive regulatory processes. In a comment that was later removed, he stated that "surviving lawsuits is not resilience," reinforcing that institutional trust depends on neutral and shared governance, not on a single company.
He added that neutrality in finance isn't defined by the number of nodes or simply being open source. He believes billion-dollar disputes can't be resolved by validators alone, but rather by solid legal frameworks, noting that SWIFT acts as a neutral intermediary between more than 11.000 global institutions.
Cryptocurrency entrepreneurs, however, disagreed. Evgeny Yurtaev, CEO of Zerion, argued that true neutrality comes from open protocols that ensure fairness through code. Similarly, Merlin Egalite, co-founder of Morpho, argued that DeFi infrastructure should have immutable code, minimal governance, and no bias, unlike the model adopted by SWIFT.
The discussion reinforces the gap between the vision of traditional finance and the proposal of cryptocurrencies, where decentralization is seen as the way to ensure equity and resilience.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Tonight, a "dovish rate hike"?
The Federal Reserve is almost certain to raise interest rates tonight, but the key issue is "what will be said after the hike." Citi characterizes this move as a "fine-tuning" adjustment, suggesting there is no inevitable future rate hike, yet warns that if Chairman Powell does not provide clear forward guidance, it will trigger significant market volatility. Goldman Sachs bluntly stated that there is insufficient economic foundation for this rate hike, with inflation being merely a one-off factor, and expects this to be a "signal-less rate hike."
JPMorgan: "Open source disruption" and "AI safety" are not issues, there is still room for capital expenditure in the next two years, semiconductor equipment will become the "new bottleneck"
JPMorgan believes that open-source models are not a threat, regulatory disruptions are only short-term, and cloud vendors’ leverage remains low—the fundamentals of computing power investment have not changed. It forecasts that the capital expenditure of the seven major tech giants will soar from $443 billion in 2025 to $1.577 trillion in 2027, with semiconductor equipment becoming the core bottleneck of the supply chain and a new round of price increases expected in wafer foundry and advanced packaging.
Micron executive: Storage determines AI limits, substantial new capacity will come after 2028
Micron executive Sumit Sadana stated that memory bandwidth and capacity have become the core factors determining the performance ceiling of AI systems. In the face of structural imbalances between supply and demand, Micron expects to increase capital expenditure to over $45 billion in fiscal year 2027, but due to process complexity, substantive new capacity will not be released until 2028. Additionally, long-term supply agreements are reshaping the industry's business model, and humanoid robots will trigger the next wave of massive demand.
Goldman Sachs warns top clients: AI momentum trading shows unprecedented cracks, recommends hedging
Goldman Sachs has issued a rare warning to top clients: deep structural cracks are emerging in AI momentum. The AI-themed basket has dropped nearly 45% from its peak, with the one-day performance gap between short-term and long-term momentum reaching a five-year high. Capital is accelerating its shift from semiconductors to software. Goldman Sachs explicitly recommends that investors with AI exposure start hedging.
